Document 1-03-1

 

Saltwater Flume Project:

Final Report
 
 

EML 4551C: Senior Design Project

Dr. Luongo Instruct.

Dr. Thistle Client

11/30/2000

Coastline Research Inc.

Design Team 10

Takenya Williams

Ivan Lee

Arnett Flowers



Back to Fall Reports

Table of Contents

1.0. Introduction
2.0. Customer Needs Assessment
3.0. Preliminary Design Specifications
    3.1. Design Team Specifications
    3.2. First Design Concept
    3.3. Second Design Concept
    3.4. Third Design Concept
4.0. Final Design Concept
5.0. Conclusion
    Appendix A
    Appendix B
    Appendix C
 

  1.0. Introduction
 

Temperature changes can be a major cause of error in an experiment. They can cause data readings to be slightly off and inconsistent, which is the case with the salt water flume at the Florida State University (FSU) Marine Laboratory. A temperature regulator is needed to solve the problem completely, and eliminate any error caused by temperature changes.


Figure 1.1: Water Flume
 

The design for the temperature regulator of the salt water flume begins with the basic flume itself. The salt water flume is an apparatus that is used by marine biologist and oceanographers to conduct experiments using sea water. Figure 1 shows a drawing of the water flume.

The sea water is pumped into the marine laboratory and collected in a holding tank. The water is then pumped into head tank using any combination of one to four pumps. Each pump has about 1 hp and the motor is about 3450 rpm. The water is moved through PVC piping. The head tank is basically another type of holding tank. It allows the excess water to collect in it before it flows into the flume. It acts as a break to slow down the flow of the water. The water then passes to the filters and into the flume. The filters aid in the process of keeping the water flow at an even and uniform flow throughout the width if the flume. The water flows through the flume and collects again in the holding tank. The process repeats itself for the duration of the experiment, reusing the water in the holding tank.

The problem that the marine biologist and oceanographers are having with the flume is the temperature changes. In the initial design of the flume, a temperature change in the water was not a conceived problem. Recently, it was discovered that the water in the flume was being slightly heated up by the pumps by about 10o –20o. To keep the temperature the constant throughout the duration of the experiment, a temperature regular must be added to the flume.

A temperature regulating device is an apparatus that aids in keeping the temperature constant. Most simple types of these devices are composed of a thermocouple or some other type of temperature sensing device, a thermostat indicator, and a cooling or heating device. The cooling device may consist of a fan or some type of system using a coolant like antifreeze. Heating devices main components consist of heating coils. Some temperature regulating devices also come with thermostat controllers, which allow the user to set a certain temperature for the regulator to maintain.

TOP
 

2.0. Customer Needs Assessment
 

Several meetings with Dr. Thistle were conducted on the Florida State University campus as well as the Marine Research Facility at Alligator Point. During the interviews the client stated the following items which the Temperature Regulator would have to perform:

Client Needs and Wants Statement:

Taking these statements, there were several brainstorming sessions to explore the goals that needed to be accomplished. For example, it is necessary to control the temperature. Previously, the best way to accomplish this was not clear; therefore, a list of design specifications was created.

TOP
 

3.0. Preliminary Design Specifications
 

At the visits to the Florida State University Marine Lab, measurements of the current system were taken. Questions were asked and experiments were conducted to gather initial data on how the system performed. This led to the newer specifications stated below:

TOP
 

3.1. Design Team Specifications
 
 

These specifications provided a better understanding of what needs to be done. Some of the specifications were noted by "TBD". This meant that the data for finalizing a value at this phase was not yet complete. From these a basic design black box (Figure 3.1.1 in Appendix A) was created. This showed what critical system would be needed to accomplish the task of maintaining the water temperature. These tasks were measuring the water temperature, drawing water into the cooler, cooling the water, activating fail safes to stop the system in the event of failure or exposed wires, and returning water to flow stream. Once this was generated, the question of how the system would perform became apparent. An idea of how the system would go about the process of monitoring and cooling the water was completed. From group discussions, a work breakdown structure (WBS) (Figure 3.1.2 in Appendix A) was made. All minutes from the meetings are include in Appendix B). This provided the basis of how the electronic control would be performed. For the physical system design, the team broke the system into six major parts. This was almost identical to the design black box except that it included the system’s mounting. From this, the design team decided on initial concepts that would accomplish each of the six critical subsystems for the design.

The house of quality (Table 3.1.1 in Appendix A) was constructed to distinguish the importance of each specification. This took the nineteen specifications and put them against various categories (such as operator, price, safety, and etc.). The relationships between the specifications and the categories were ranked to see which would objectively be the first to be focused upon. A matrix on the top to compare the relationships between the categories was also constructed. The system was ranked based on 9’s, 3’s, 1’s, and blanks. Nines showed the strongest relationships while 1’s were marginally related. A blank space represents trivial or no relationship between the categories. This helped to show on which specifications the team should focus.

TOP
 

3.2. First Design Concept
 

An above head heat exchanger was the concept was first introduced. The idea was to extract water from the reservoir into a box of cool fluid and to cool down the water through conduction. Several problems developed for this concept. First of all, the fluid temperature inside the box is hard to control. Second, the marine biologists need the space above the flume to observe their experiments. A large box installed above the flume will obstruct their working space. Therefore, the above head heat exchanger is not feasible for this project.
 


 
Figure 3.1: Above head heat exchanger.

TOP
 

3.3. Second Design Concept
 

A counter flow heat exchanger is the second concept. An external pipe is wrapped around a section of the pipe, which comes out of the reservoir and into the head tank. Cooling fluid travels in the opposite direction of the return flow. In this way, heat is extracted from the pipe flow before it returns to the head tank. The problem with this design is that the diameter of the heat exchanger is too large for it to be mounted to the wall. Also, PVC pipes were used for the return link. Since PVC is not a good conductor, it is difficult to obtain heat transfer through these pipes. A longer and larger counter flow heat exchanger is then needed which obviously cannot be done due to the restricted space.
 


 
Figure 3.2: Counter flow heat exchanger.

TOP
 

3.4. Third Design Concept
 

The third design concept is to isolate the pump from the motor thus eliminate the heat transfer to take place. This is a very radical concept, which should work in theory, but in reality it will not be feasible. One of the many problems is that isolating the pump and motor will mean that disassembling the existing pump will be necessary. By disassembling, it will void the manufacturer’s warranty. Second, an extended shaft will be needed. By extending the shaft, there will be very difficult to align the pump and motor and it may not be reliable. Also extra research in material for the shaft is necessary and customizing the shaft will be very expensive. Therefore, the sponsor did not approve this concept.
 


 
Figure 3.3: Pump isolating system.

TOP
 

4.0 Final Design Concept
 

The final concept was decided to be the first concept, however, during the latest meeting with Dr. Thistle and the machinist, an idea of buying a chiller that is already being manufactured in the market and installing cooling pipes into the reservoir was mentioned. This seems like the simplest solution to the problem, however, more research must be gathered, and until such material is gathered the first design concept will remain as the final design concept. All calculations and drawings for the design are in Appendix B and Appendix C, respectively.

The team will need to calculate the amount of heat that is input into the system and find out which chiller is the best to be used. The design team also needs to decide the best configuration of the cooling pipes which will be dropped into the reservoir and the best location within the reservoir.

TOP
 

5.0. Conclusion
 

All designs for the heat exchanger were examined and shown to the client.  The designs were looked at by the client and the designedliked best was design 1.  It was also talked about finding a commercially made chiller that was already available, so that one would not have to be built.  This idea is now being researched and will be he direction that will be continued in the next semester.  This could prove to bit of a set back, but is not anticipated to be a big problem.  The project has been very productive thus far.

TOP
 
 

Appendix A
 

House of Quality
 

Black Box









Figure 3.1.2: WBS
 
 

TOP

Appendix B

TOP

Appendix C







Detailed Drawings and Calculations
 
 

This sections presents all major engineering drawings and the inventory list

Generator:__________________________________________________
 

Checker: _______________________________________________________________
 

Approved: ____________________________________________________________
 
 

Figure 4.1: Three primary Views of assembled Temperature Regulator
 
 

Figure 4.2: Engineering Drawing of assembled outer box of unit
 
 

Figure 4.3: Engineering Drawing of Assembled foam insert
 
 

Figure 4.4: Engineering Drawing of the Exterior Seal Half (two are put together to complete seal)
 

The following is a listing of the materials needed to build the Temperature regulator. Most of the materials are readily available in Tallahassee.
 
 

Table 4.1: Inventory Table for the Temperature Regulator
 
#
Part
Quantity
Material
Company (supplier)
1
Exchanger Hose 8.8m Rubber & Plastic Lowe’s
2
1-3/4" coupling (2 in O.D.) 2 PVC Lowe’s
3
1" coupling (1-1/4 O.D.) 2 PVC Lowe’s
4
1" 90 elbows 8 PVC Lowe’s
5
Liquid Gasket Sealant 2 Rubber Lowe’s
6
Foam insert 0.024m^3 Styrofoam sheeting Lowe’s
7
Outer walls 0.026m^3 Plexiglas Lowe’s
8
1" tubing 12.12m PVC Lowe’s
9
Ice 150kg Desalinated Water Ice machine
10
700 Gal/h submersible pump 1 Product information TBD Pond Master
11
Half water seals 4 Plexiglas Machined supplier TBD
12
1" shutoff valve 1 PVC Lowe’s
13
Aquarium Sealant 1 Silicon Caulking Lowe’s or Wal-Mart
14
¼"-20x2" Lag bolts 4 Zinc coated Steel Lowe’s
15
¼"-20 Washers 8 Zinc coated Steel Lowe’s
16
¼" Nuts 4 Zinc coated Steel Lowe’s
17
¼"-20x1" Machine screws TBD Stainless Steel Lowe’s or Home Depot
18
Lock-Tite 1 Polymers Lowe’s or Home Depot
19
Tubing clamps 4 Stainless Steel Lowe’s
20
Epoxy  2 epoxy Lowe’s
21
4" I.D. pipe section   Schedule 40 PVC Lowe’s
22
4" Diameter Disk ½" thick 1 Plexiglas Lowe’s
23
Assembly labor TBD    
  *All costs of materials per unit have not been determined

 
TOP