Member Name

Kelan Green

Industrial Engineer
Member Two

Samantha Bell

Industrial Engineer
Member Two

Dillon Mathena

Mechanical Engineer
Member Two

Matthew Emerick

Mechanical Engineer
Member Two

Leonardo Tellez

Industrial Engineer
Member Two

Carlie Cunningham

Industrial Engineer

Project Abstract


Currently, there are no uniform Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing (GD&T) automated process for additive manufacturing in the aerospace industry. Some American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards do exist, however, they are specific towards metal powder bed fusion. The scope of this project is to design and develop a new process to quantify and decrease variability in 3D printed parts. To do so, the variability of various 3D printers will be also be quantified, with the end goal of developing a new automated GD&T system for 3D printed parts that will not only decrease variability, but reduce waste in processing time.

To further project progress, the industrial engineering department and mechanical engineering department have teamed up to provide engineers who work together to develop, manufacture and design the automated process at hand.

Project Sponsor


NGC Logo

Define Phase

Identifying the Problem

Executive Summary

Intepreting Customer Needs

Mechanical Prototype

Design Goals

Mechanical Prototype

Define Phase Summary


During the Define Phase, the team began by identifying the root problem and developing an initial scope. This initial scope was adjusted and narrowed down to quantify, and thus reduce, variability in 3D printed parts by examining the not only the part variability, but the variability of the printers themselves. We functionally decomposed the problem statement, interpreted customer needs, and established some base design goals for future phases.

Measure Phase

Following completion of the Define Phase, the team moved into the Measure Phase. A test plan was created which featured three different printers (Lulzbot, Ender, Dexter) all printing batches of two cylinders of identical diameter but of different heights (0.5 inch, 1 inch). After completing the prints, the cylinders were scanned using a VX Elements 3D scanning software. The initial plan was to overlay the scanned files onto our CAD models of the cylinders in order to measure variance. However, issues arose with the software, so 0.01 mm precision calipers were used to measure diameters at various points on the cylinder. These measurements were used in various statistical analysis methods and the team was able to obtain baseline measurement data to be used in the proceeding phases.

Measuring Baseline Performance

Executive Summary

DOE Analysis

Mechanical Prototype

Process Capability Analysis

Mechanical Prototype

Measure Phase Summary


During the measure Phase, the team began by creating a test plan to determine the variability and errors of three 3D printers; the Lulzbot, the Dexter Arm, and the Ender. The team printed 20 cylinder, with varying diameters (0.5" and 1.0") and consistant height. From here, caliphers were used to measure each and determine statistical anomalies between printers. The various tools utilized in this phase were the DOE analysis and process capability charts.


Analyze Phase

After completing the Measure phase, the team obtained baseline measurements of the cylinder diameters using calipers. A DOE and Pareto Chart were done and the printers were determined to have the most effect on cylinder variability. In the Analyze phase, the team was able to use the VXinspect software to further analyze the cylinders and characterize/quantify our printer variability. This software allows for a 3D scan to be overlayed with a CAD model. It automatically creates a color map of the scan deviation from the CAD model. Also, diameter and height, as well as cylindricity measurements were taken using the software. The team inspected all cylinders and were able to identify root causes of variability in the printers, which we will consider in our upcoming Design phase in order to develop a micro-factory that will reduce the variability found in this phase.

VXinspect Inspection Example

Mechanical Prototype

Inspection Results

Mechanical Prototype

Mechanical Prototype

Mechanical Prototype

Analyze Phase Summary


At the conclusion of the analyze phase, the team was able to use the VXinspect software to further analyze the cylinders and characterize/quantify our printer variability. This software allows for a 3D scan to be overlayed with a CAD model. It automatically creates a color map of the scan deviation from the CAD model. This led into the design phase, where various components were developed at the request of the team's sponsor.


Design Phase

During the design phase, various components were designed for use within the system. A Renishaw probe holder was developed in order to protect the Renishaw probe and allow for the FANUC robot to pick up the probe safely. The universal tooling mount was designed in order to fit different tooling and probes directly to the FANUC robot. A tooling mount holder was created in order to store various probes for use within the system. Concurrently, a case study was conducted on idle tiems of the system. This was done over an 8-hour work day and a 24-hour workday in order to quantify how many prints can be quality checked over these time periods.

Renishaw Probe Holder

Mechanical Prototype

Universal Tooling Mount

Mechanical Prototype

Tooling Mount Holder

Mechanical Prototype

Future Work


Future Work

Available Downloads

View the Analyze Phase Report here.