Student request: change notations. Mine seem better than the book's, though.
Suppose I have a basis S, .Then any arbitrary vector
can be written as
Suppose I have another basis S', .Then the same vector
can also be written as
The relationship between the two sets of coordinates is always
Please note that this use of language is confusing: while P is called the transformation matrix from S to S', it really takes coordinates from S' and converts them to coordinates in S. Just the opposite of what you would expect.
In still other words, if you assume S is an ``old'' basis, and S' is a ``new'' basis you want to switch to, then the transformation matrix P from old to new really computes old coordinates from new ones. To get the new coordinates from the old ones, instead use Q=P-1 (the transformation matrix from new to old):
Matrix P takes the form:
Warning: I think the books exposition (p207-210) is very confusing, partly by not using vector symbols to indicate vectors versus coordinates. I suggest you stick with my exposition above.