Solve the transformed equation and convert the solution back to
physical space.
2.28k.
2.28b. You could also diagonalized this equation by rotating
the coordinate system and then stretching the axes. Is the
two-dimensional canonical transformation equivalent to this? in
particular, are the lines of constant and orthogonal?
3.41. This is similar to the Laplace version discussed in class.
Describe the reason that there is no solution physically, considering
it as a heat conduction problem in a circular plate.
3.44. This is essentially the uniqueness proof given in class,
which can also be found in solved problems 3.14-3.16. However, you
will want to write out the two parts of the surface integral
separately since the boundary conditions are a mixture of the two
cases 3.14 and 3.15 (with ).
Show that the following Laplace equation problem has a
unique solution, :
This is essentially the uniqueness proof given in class, which can
also be found in solved problems 3.14-3.16. However, you will want
to write the four parts of the surface integral out separately since
the boundary conditions are a mixture of the three cases 3.14-3.16.
Show that the following Laplace equation problem has infinitely
many solutions beyond :
Hint: Guess a very simple nonzero solution and check that it satisfies
all boundary conditions and that its second order derivatives
are zero. Since the equations are linear, any arbitrary multiple of
this solution is also a solution.
Find the Green’s function in three-dimensional unbounded
space . Use either the method of section 2.1 or 2.2 of
the web page example
as you prefer.