Next: 1977: continued
Up: D'Alembert's Paradox
Previous: 1975: Definition of
- 1971 Belcher, Burggraf, Cooke, Robins & Stewartson (CN). Too
short.
- 1973 Collins & Dennis (Fourier/CN). Too short.
- 1974 Telionis & Tsahalis: yes!
- 1977 Van Dommelen & Shen (Lagrangian): yes!
- 1979 Cebeci (zigzag box): no to TT!
- 1979 Wang (zigzag CN): yes!
- 1980 Van Dommelen & Shen (Lagrangian): no to TT, yes to C, no
to W, yes!
- 1982 Cebeci (zigzag box): no to W, maybe!
- 1983 Cowley (small time): yes to VDS.
- 1984 Ingham (Fourier): yes to VDS.
- 1986 Cebeci (intelligent): no!
- 1987 Henkes & Veldman (upwind CN): yes to VDS.
- 1989 Riley & Vasantha (centered CN): yes to VDS.
- 1993 Christov & Tzankov (ADI): yes to VDS.
- 1995 Van Dommelen & Shankar (zigzag CN): yes to VDS.
- 1997 Weinan E & Bjorn Engquist (analytical): yes!
Next: 1977: continued
Up: D'Alembert's Paradox
Previous: 1975: Definition of
05/16/00 0:40:52