Concept Screening
The concepts arrived upon using the morphological chart are then screened against each other and against the customer needs. This is done as a preliminary decision matrix to see which concepts are going to be further analyzed.
1 to 10 | 1 to 10 | 1 to 10 | 1 to 10 | |
Concept Selection | Concept 1 | Concept 2 | Concept 3 | Concept 4 |
Capable of harvesting several
types of vegetables |
10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Does not require manmade power
source |
9 | 7 | 7 | 7 |
Uses less than $100.00 worth
of material other than wood |
8 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
Can be operated by one person |
10 | 10 | 10 | 10 |
Capable of harvesting several
rows of vegetable simultaneously |
10 | 8 | 6 | 4 |
Does not damage crops |
7 | 5 | 5 | 4 |
High Storage Capacity |
8 | 5 | 7 | 3 |
Capable of sifting out excess
dirt from vegetables |
7 | 7 | 6 | 4 |
Simple shapes for ease of
construction and replacing broken parts |
5 | 7 | 7 | 8 |
Few moving parts to increase
lifespan and ease of manufacturing |
7 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
Resistant to environmental
elements |
8 | 8 | 8 | 8 |
Useful for other aspects of
farming as well as vegetable collection |
10 | 9 | 8 | 8 |
Pre-cools vegetables for
storage |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Separate storage containers
for different types of vegetables |
1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Total Points |
101 | 89 | 87 | 85 |
As a result of detailed analysis, concept one was chosen to be the most compatible with the farmer’s needs. Also, model 1 supplied sufficient methods of the wants form the specification table.
This is one way of selecting a concept where no multiplying factors are used. However, another way includes the assignment of multiplying factors to the design criteria in accordance to each ones relative importance. Hence, different scores could have been obtained for the previous example, and a different concept may have been chosen.