[Federal Register: June 5, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 108)]

[Notices]               

[Page 38644-38648]

From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]

[DOCID:fr05jn02-34]                         



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE



National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration



[Docket No 000202023-2049-03 I.D 041502E]



 

Announcement of Funding Opportunity to Submit Proposals for the 

Coastal Ecosystem Research Project in the Northern Gulf of Mexico



AGENCY: Center for Sponsored Coastal Ocean Research/Coastal Ocean 

Program (CSCOR/COP), National Ocean Service (NOS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce.



ACTION: Notice of funding availability for financial assistance for 

project grants and cooperative agreements.



-----------------------------------------------------------------------



SUMMARY: The purpose of this notice is to advise the public that CSCOR/

COP is soliciting proposals to support 1 to 3 year studies of coastal 

ecosystem research related to hypoxia over the Louisiana continental 

shelf in the northern Gulf of Mexico. Funding is contingent upon the 

availability of Federal appropriations. It is anticipated that projects 

funded under this announcement will have a May 1, 2003 start date.



DATES: The deadline for receipt of proposals at the CSCOR/COP office is 

3 p.m., local time September 17,2002.

    (Note that late-arriving applications provided to a delivery 

service on or before September 16,2002 with delivery guaranteed before 

3 p.m., local time on September 17,2002, will be accepted for review if 

the applicant can document that the application was provided to the 

delivery service with delivery to the address listed below guaranteed 

prior to the specified closing date and time, and, in any event, the 

proposals are received in the CSCOR/COP office by 3 p.m., local time, 

no later than 2 business days following the closing date.)



ADDRESSES: Submit the original and 15 copies of your proposal to Center 

for Sponsored Coastal Ocean Research/Coastal Ocean Program (N/SCI2), 

SSMC4, 8th Floor, Station 8243, 1305 East-West Highway, Silver 

Spring, MD 20910, attn. N-GOMEX 2002.

    NOAA and Standard Form Applications with instructions are 

accessible on the following CSCOR/COP Internet Site: http://

www.cop.noaa.gov under the COP Grants Information Section, Part D, 

Application Forms for Initial Proposal Submission.

    Forms may be viewed and, in most cases, filled in by computer. All 

forms must be printed, completed, and mailed to CSCOR/COP with original 

signatures.



[[Page 38645]]



 If you are unable to access this information, you may call CSCOR/COP 

at 301-713-3338 to leave a mailing request.



FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Technical Information. Dr. Kenric 

Osgood, N-GOMEX 2002 Program Manager, CSCOR/COP, 301-713-3338/ext 163, 

Internet: Kenric.Osgood@noaa.gov.

    Business Management Information. Leslie McDonald, CSCOR/COP Grants 

Administrator, 301-713-3338/ext 155, Internet: Leslie.McDonald@noaa.gov



SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:



Electronic Access



    The following web sites furnish results of studies concerning the 

periodic hypoxia associated with the northern Gulf of Mexico: http://

www.cop.noaa.gov/pubs/das/das14.html, for results from the Nutrient 

Enhanced Coastal Ocean Productivity (NECOP) study, and; http://

www.nos.noaa.gov/Products/pubs--hypox.html for Gulf of Mexico hypoxia 

reports produced by the Committee on Environment and Natural Resources 

(CENR). Hard copies of these reports can be obtained from the CSCOR/COP 

office. The Action Plan for reducing, mitigating, and controlling 

hypoxia in the northern Gulf of Mexico that resulted from the CENR 

reports is available at: http://www.epa.gov/msbasin/planintro.htm

    A general description of ongoing work in the northern Gulf of 

Mexico funded by the CSCOR/COP is provided at: http://www.cop.noaa.gov/

Fact--Sheets/NGOMEX.htm A listing of the individual ongoing projects 

funded by the CSCOR/COP is provided at http://www.cop.noaa.gov/

projects/GoMex/abstract-links.htm

    University-National Oceanographic Laboratory System (UNOLS) Ship 

Time Request Form is available in electronic format at: http://

www.gso.uri.edu/unols/ship/shiptime.html. UNOLS' vessel requirements 

are identified later in this document under Part I: Schedule and 

Proposal Submission, (7) Budget of this document.



Background



Program Description



    For complete program description and other requirements criteria 

for the Center for Sponsored Coastal Ocean Research/Coastal Ocean 

Program, see the COP General Grant Administration Terms and Conditions 

annual notification in the Federal Register (66 FR 63019, December 4, 

2001) and at the CSCOR/COP home page.

    Coastal regions dominated by large rivers are disproportionately 

important to the biological production of the world's oceans primarily 

because these rivers carry large amounts of ``new'' nitrogen. The 

Northern Gulf of Mexico coastal ecosystem, which is influenced by the 

Mississippi River, supports high primary and secondary production and 

is an important river-dominated ecosystem. Approximately 20 percent of 

the U.S. commercial fishery landings, by dollar value, are from the 

northern Gulf. Major recreational fisheries also exist in this region.

    There is a strong relationship between riverine inputs (especially 

nutrients) and primary production, followed in turn by zooplankton 

production and fish production in a classic nutrient-phytoplankton-

zooplankton-fish (NPZF) food web. Because anthropogenic nitrogen 

loadings from the Mississippi River to the Gulf of Mexico have 

increased dramatically during the past several decades, many changes in 

the ecosystem of the northern Gulf have occurred, including (1) an 

initial increase in overall biological production, (2) the annual 

development of an extensive zone of bottom water hypoxia during the 

summer stratified period; and (3) an apparent shift from a balanced 

pelagic/demersal fish community to one significantly more dominated by 

pelagic fisheries.

    Several past and present programs have studied the seasonal hypoxia 

associated with the northern Gulf of Mexico. Notably, from 1990 to 

1997, the CSCOR/COP supported a study on Nutrient Enhanced Coastal 

Ocean Productivity (NECOP), and the Committee on Environment and 

Natural Resources (CENR) recently completed an integrated assessment of 

Gulf of Mexico hypoxia. Results and reports of these studies can be 

found on the web sites or obtained from CSCOR/COP as listed under 

``Electronic Access'' of this document.

    This solicitation for proposals will augment the existing program 

which was started in fiscal year 2000 and expanded in 2001, to examine 

the inter-relationships driving the Mississippi River-dominated Gulf of 

Mexico ecosystem. Abstracts of ongoing studies funded by CSCOR/COP in 

the northern Gulf of Mexico are available on the CSCOR/COP internet 

site that is provided in this document under ``Electronic Access'' of 

this document. All ongoing studies are scheduled to end by September 

2003. The planned suite of studies will enable improved predictions 

about future effects of nutrient loading, eutrophication, hypoxia, and 

climate change on the northern Gulf of Mexico ecosystem.

    The underlying goal of the entire program is to develop a 

predictive capability for the physical, chemical, and biological 

components of the Louisiana continental shelf ecosystem. In particular, 

it is desirable to obtain the ability to input different possible 

physical forcing and nutrient loading scenarios into a predictive model 

for the region in order to predict the effects on the oxygen 

concentrations and the biological system, including the effects on 

economically and ecologically important species. CSCOR/COP's intent is 

to provide timely and high-quality scientific results that can be used 

in an adaptive management program to restore and protect the Louisiana 

continental shelf ecosystem. The results of the funded research 

proposals should be useful to resource managers by helping them make 

informed decisions and assess alternative management strategies. This 

solicitation for proposals is one more step in the development of this 

predictive capability.



Research Priorities



    This announcement seeks proposals to conduct research focused on 

understanding the causes and effects of the hypoxic zone over the 

Louisiana continental shelf and the prediction of its future extent and 

impacts. At this time, top priorities for the CSCOR/COP research 

program include (1) modeling studies for the region of the northern 

Gulf of Mexico affected by seasonal hypoxia centered over the Louisiana 

continental shelf, and (2) observational studies necessary to support 

the modeling studies.

    Modeling studies are requested that extend beyond prior modeling 

efforts for the region of the northern Gulf of Mexico affected by 

seasonal hypoxia. This could include a natural evolution from 

empirically based statistical models, to process-oriented modeling 

studies, to a predictive modeling capability. Models of particular 

interest include the following: Models of oceanographic and climate 

influences on water column stability and nutrient flux; the impacts of 

the combination of these factors on productivity, trophic response and 

hypoxic zone dynamics; and the ultimate impacts to, and responses of, 

commercially and recreationally important fisheries. Individual studies 

may model one or more of these portions of the desired whole, but the 

models must be designed so that they can be combined with other 

components to form an efficient, integrative whole.



[[Page 38646]]



    Observational studies are requested in support of the modeling 

studies. Physical, chemical, and biological observational studies are 

needed to provide (1) data for the boundary conditions of the models, 

(2) the process rate information needed by the models, and (3) 

validation data for the models. It is expected that the data/results 

acquired through the observational studies will be made available for 

assimilation into models being developed for the region and would 

thereby play an important role in their future development. 

Observational studies could include shipboard surveys, mooring 

observations, drifters, analysis of regional satellite data and in situ 

or laboratory rate measurements/experiments.



Part I: Schedule and Proposal Submission



    This document requests full proposals only. The provisions for 

proposal preparation provided here are mandatory. Proposals received 

after the published deadline or proposals that deviate from the 

prescribed format will be returned to the sender without further 

consideration. Information regarding this announcement, additional 

background information, and required Federal forms are available on the 

CSCOR/COP home page.



Full Proposals



    Applications submitted in response to this announcement require an 

original proposal and 15 proposal copies at time of submission. This 

includes color or high-resolution graphics, unusually sized materials, 

or otherwise unusual materials submitted as part of the proposal. For 

color graphics, submit either color originals or color copies. The 

stated requirements for the number of proposal copies provide for a 

timely review process. Facsimile transmissions and electronic mail 

submissions will not be accepted.



Required Elements



    All recipients must follow the instructions in the preparation of 

the CSCOR/COP application forms included under Part II: Further 

Supplementary Information, (10) Application forms and kit of this 

document. Each proposal must also include the following ten elements or 

will be returned to sender without further consideration:

    (1) Standard Form 424. At time of proposal submission, all 

applicants anticipating direct funding shall submit the Standard Form, 

SF-424, ``Application for Federal Assistance,'' to indicate the total 

amount of funding proposed for the whole project period. This form is 

to be the cover page for the original proposal and all requested 

copies. Multi-institutional proposals must include signed SF-424 forms 

from all institutions requesting funding.

    (2) Signed Summary title page. The title page should be signed by 

the Principal Investigator (PI). The Summary title page identifies the 

project's title, starting with the acronym: N-GOMEX 2002, a short title 

(less than 50 characters), and the PI's name and affiliation, complete 

address, phone, FAX and E-mail information. The requested budget for 

each fiscal year should be included on the Summary title page. Multi-

investigator proposals must include the names and affiliations of each 

investigator on the title page. Multi-institution proposals must also 

identify the lead investigator from each institution and the requested 

funding for each fiscal year for each institution on the title page, 

but no signatures are required on the title page from the additional 

institutions. Lead investigator and separate budget information is not 

requested on the title page for institutions that are proposed to 

receive funds through a subcontract to the lead institution; however, 

the COP Summary Proposal Budget Form and accompanying budget 

justification must be submitted for each subcontractor. For further 

details on budget information, please see Section (7) Budget of this 

Part.

    (3) One-page abstract/project summary. The Project Summary 

(Abstract) Form, which is to be submitted at time of application, shall 

include an introduction of the problem, rationale, scientific 

objectives and/or hypotheses to be tested, and a brief summary of work 

to be completed. The prescribed CSCOR/COP format for the Project 

Summary Form can be found on the CSCOR/COP Internet site under the 

Grants Information section, Part D.

    The summary should appear on a separate page, headed by the 

proposal title, institution(s), investigator(s), total proposed cost 

and budget period. It should be written in the third person. The 

summary is used to help compare proposals quickly and allows the 

respondents to summarize these key points in their own words.

    (4) Statement of work/project description. The proposed project 

must be completely described, including identification of the problem, 

scientific objectives, proposed methodology, and relevance to the 

program goals and objectives. The project description section 

(including relevant results from prior support) should not exceed 15 

pages. Page limits are inclusive of figures and other visual materials, 

but exclusive of references and milestone chart.

    This section should clearly identify project management with a 

description of the functions of each PI within a team. It should 

provide a full scientific justification for the research. Do not simply 

reiterate justifications presented in this document. It should also 

include:

    (a) The objective for the period of proposed work and its expected 

significance;

    (b) The relation to the present state of knowledge in the field and 

the relation to previous work and work in progress by the proposing 

principal investigator(s);

    (c) A discussion of how the proposed project lends value to the 

program goal;

    (d) Potential coordination with other investigators.

    (5) References cited. Reference information is required. Each 

reference must include the names of all authors in the same sequence in 

which they appear in the publications, the article title, volume 

number, page numbers and year of publications. While there is no 

established page limitation, this section should include bibliographic 

citations only and should not be used to provide parenthetical 

information outside the 15-page project description.

    (6) Milestone chart. Provide time lines of major tasks covering the 

duration of the proposed project.

    (7) Budget. At time of proposal submission, all applicants are 

required to submit a COP Summary Proposal Budget Form for each fiscal 

year increment. Multi-institution proposals must include a COP Summary 

Proposal Budget Form for each institution, and multi-investigator 

proposals using a lead investigator with a subcontract's approach must 

submit a COP Summary Proposal Budget Form for each subcontractor.

    Each subcontract or subgrant should be listed as a separate item. 

Describe products/services to be obtained and indicate the 

applicability or necessity of each to the project. Provide separate 

budgets for each subgrant or contract regardless of the dollar value 

and indicate the basis for the cost estimates. List all subgrant or 

contract costs under line item number 5 - Subcontracts on the COP 

Summary Proposal Budget Form.

    The use of this budget form will provide for a detailed annual 

budget and for the level of detail required by the CSCOR/COP program 

staff to evaluate the effort to be invested by investigators and staff 

on a specific project. The COP budget form is compatible with forms in 

use by other agencies that participate in joint projects



[[Page 38647]]



with CSCOR/COP and can be found on the CSCOR/COP home page under the 

COP Grants Information section, Part D.

    All applications must include a budget narrative and a 

justification to support all proposed budget categories. The SF-424A, 

Budget Information (Non-Construction) Form, will be requested only from 

those applicants subsequently recommended for award.

    Ship time needs should be clearly identified in the proposed 

budget. The investigator is responsible for requesting ship time and 

for meeting all requirements to ensure the availability of requested 

ship time. Copies of relevant ship time request forms should be 

included with the proposal. For example, the UNOLS Ship Time Request 

Form is available at the website cited earlier in this document under 

the section ``Electronic Access.''

    (8) Biographical sketch. All principal and co-investigators must 

provide summaries of up to 2 pages that include the following:

    (a) A listing of professional and academic essentials and mailing 

address;

    (b) A list of up to five publications most closely related to the 

proposed project and five other significant publications. Additional 

lists of publications, lectures, and the rest should not be included;

    (c) A list of all persons (including their organizational 

affiliation) in alphabetical order, with whom the investigator has 

collaborated on a project or publication within the last 48 months, 

including collaborators on the proposal and persons listed in the 

publications. If no collaborators exist, this should be so indicated;

    (d) A list of persons (including their organizational affiliation) 

with whom the individual has had an association like thesis advisor or 

postdoctoral scholar sponsor;

    (e) A list of the names and institutions of the individual's own 

graduate and postgraduate advisors.

    The material presented in (c, d, and e) is used to assist in 

identifying potential conflicts or bias in the selection of reviewers.

    (9) Current and pending support. Describe all current and pending 

financial/funding support for all principal and co-investigators, 

including subsequent funding in the case of continuing grants. All 

current support from whatever source (e.g., Federal, state or local 

government agencies, private foundations, industrial or other 

commercial organizations) must be listed. The proposed project and all 

other projects or activities requiring a portion of time of the 

principal investigator or co-investigators should be included, even if 

they receive no salary support from the projects. The total award 

amount for the entire award period covered (including indirect costs) 

should be shown as well as the number of person-months per year to be 

devoted to the project, regardless of source of support.

    (10) Proposal format and assembly. The original proposal should be 

clamped in the upper left-hand corner, but left individually unbound. 

The 15 additional copies can be stapled in the upper left-hand corner 

or bound on the left edge. The page margin must be 1 inch (2.5 cm) at 

the top, bottom, left and right, and the typeface standard 12-point 

size must be clear and easily legible. Proposals should be single 

spaced.



Part II: Further Supplementary Information



    (1) Program authorities. For a list of all program authorities for 

the Center for Sponsored Coastal Ocean Research/Coastal Ocean Program, 

see the General Grant Administration Terms and Conditions of the 

Coastal Ocean Program published in the Federal Register (66 FR 63019, 

December 4, 2001) and at the CSCOR/COP home page. Specific Authority 

cited for this announcement is 33 U.S.C. 1442.

    (2) Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number. The CFDA 

number for the Coastal Ocean Program is 11.478.

    (3) Program description. For complete CSCOR/COP program 

descriptions, see the General Grant Administration Terms and Conditions 

of the Coastal Ocean Program published in the Federal Register (66 FR 

63019, December 4, 2001).

    (4) Funding availability. Funding is contingent upon availability 

of Federal appropriations. Approximately $3,000,000 will be available 

for supporting studies proposed by submissions to this announcement 

during the first year, and approximately $2,000,000 during the second 

and third years. It is estimated that seven to fifteen awards will be 

made as a result of this announcement.

    If an application is selected for funding, NOAA has no obligation 

to provide any additional prospective funding in connection with that 

award in subsequent years. Continuation of an award to increase funding 

or to extend the period of performance is based on satisfactory 

performance and is at the total discretion of the funding agency.

    Publication of this notice does not obligate any agency to any 

specific award or to obligate any part of the entire amount of funds 

available. Recipients and subrecipients are subject to all Federal laws 

and agency policies, regulations and procedures applicable to Federal 

financial assistance awards.

    (5) Matching requirements. None.

    (6) Type of funding instrument. Project Grants for non-Federal 

applicants, interagency transfer agreements, or any other appropriate 

mechanisms other than project grants or cooperative agreements for 

Federal applicants.

    (7) Eligibility criteria: For complete eligibility criteria for the 

CSCOR/COP, see the COP General Grant Administration Terms and 

Conditions annual document in the Federal Register (66 FR 63019 

December 4, 2001) and the CSCOR/COP home page. Eligible applicants are 

institutions of higher education, not-for-profit institutions, state, 

local and Indian tribal governments, and Federal agencies. CSCOR/COP 

will accept proposals that include foreign researchers as collaborators 

with a researcher who is affiliated with a U.S. academic institution, 

Federal agency, or with any other non-profit organization.

    Applications from non-Federal and Federal applicants will be 

competed against each other. Proposals selected for funding from non-

Federal applicants will be funded through a project grant or 

cooperative agreement under the terms of this notice. Proposals 

selected for funding from NOAA employees shall be effected by an intra-

agency fund transfer. Proposals selected for funding from employees of 

a non-NOAA Federal agency will be funded through an inter-agency 

transfer.

    Note: Before non-NOAA Federal applicants may be funded, they must 

demonstrate that they have legal authority to receive funds from 

another Federal agency in excess of their appropriation. Because this 

announcement is not proposing to procure goods or services from 

applicants, the Economy Act (31 U.S.C. 1535) is not an appropriate 

legal basis.

    (8) Award period. Full Proposals can cover a project period from 1 

to 3 years. Multi-year project period funding may be funded 

incrementally on an annual basis, but, once awarded, multi-year 

projects will not compete for funding in subsequent years. Each annual 

award shall require an Implementation Plan and statement of work that 

can be easily divided into annual increments of meaningful work 

representing solid accomplishments in the event that prospective 

funding is not made available, or is discontinued.

    (9) Indirect costs. Regardless of any approved indirect cost rate 

applicable to



[[Page 38648]]



the award, the maximum dollar amount of allocable indirect costs for 

which DOC will reimburse the recipient shall be the lesser of (a) the 

line item amount for the Federal share of indirect costs contained in 

the approved budget of the award or (b) the Federal share of the total 

allocable indirect costs of the award based on the indirect cost rate 

approved by a cognizant or oversight Federal agency and current at the 

time the cost was incurred, provided the rate is approved on or before 

the award end date.

    (10) Application forms and kit. For complete information on 

application forms for the CSCOR/COP, see the COP General Grant 

Administration Terms and Conditions annual Document in the Federal 

Register (66 FR 63019, December 4, 2001) at the CSCOR/COP home page, 

and the information given under Required Elements,(6) Budget of this 

Part.

    (11) Project funding priorities. For description of project funding 

priorities, see the COP General Grant Administration Terms and 

Conditions annual notification in the Federal Register (66 FR 63019, 

December 4, 2001) and at the CSCOR/COP home page.

    (l2) Evaluation criteria. For complete information on evaluation 

criteria, see the COP General Grant Administration Terms and Conditions 

annual Document in the Federal Register (66 FR 63019, December 4, 2001) 

and at the CSCOR/COP home page.

    (13) Selection procedures. For complete information on selection 

procedures, see the COP General Grant Administration Terms and 

Conditions annual Document in the Federal Register (66 FR 63019, 

December 4, 2001) and at the CSCOR/COP home page. All proposals 

received under this specific Document will be evaluated and ranked 

individually in accordance with the assigned weights of the above 

evaluation criteria by independent peer mail review and/or panel 

review.

    (14) Other requirements. (a) For a complete description of other 

requirements, see the COP General Grant Administration Terms and 

Conditions annual Document in the Federal Register (66 FR 63019, 

December 4, 2001) and at the CSCOR/COP home page. NOAA has specific 

requirements that environmental data be submitted to the National 

Oceanographic Data Center (see section 16 below).

    (b) The Department of Commerce Pre-Award Notification Requirements 

for Grants and Cooperative Agreements contained in the Federal Register 

(66 FR 49917, October 1, 2001) are applicable to this solicitation. 

However, please note that the Department of Commerce will not implement 

the requirements of Executive Order 13202 (66 FR 49921), pursuant to 

guidance issued by the Office of Management and Budget in light of a 

court opinion which found that the Executive Order was not legally 

authorized. See Building and Construction Trades Department v. 

Allbaugh, 172 F. Supp. 2d 138 (D.D.C. 2001). This decision is currently 

on appeal. When the case has been finally resolved, the Department will 

provide further information on implementation of Executive Order 13202.

    (c) Please note that NOAA is developing a policy on internal 

overhead charges; NOAA scientists considering submission of proposals 

should contact the appropriate CSCOR/COP Program Manager for the latest 

information.

    (15) Intergovernmental review. Applications under this program are 

not subject to Executive Order l2372, ``Intergovernmental Review of 

Federal Programs.'' It has been determined that this notice is not 

significant for purposes of Executive Order 12866. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 

553(a)(2), an opportunity for public notice and comment is not required 

for this notice relating to grants, benefits, and contracts. Because 

this notice is exempt from the notice and comment provisions of the 

Administrative Procedure Act, a Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is not 

required, and none has been prepared. It has been determined that this 

notice does not contain policies with Federalism implications as that 

term is defined in Executive Order 13132.

    (16) Data archiving. Any data collected in projects supported by 

CSCOR/COP must be delivered to a National Data Center (NDC), such as 

the National Oceanographic Data Center (NODC), in a format to be 

determined by the institution, the NODC, and the Program Officer. It is 

the responsibility of the institution for the delivery of these data; 

the DOC will not provide additional support for delivery beyond the 

award. Additionally, all biological cultures established, molecular 

probes developed, genetic sequences identified, mathematical models 

constructed, or other resulting information products established 

through support provided by CSCOR/COP are encouraged to be made 

available to the general research community at no or modest handling 

charge (to be determined by the institution, Program Officer, and DOC).

    (17) This notification involves collection-of-information 

requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act. The use of 

Standard Forms 424, 424A, 424B, and SF-LLL has been approved by the 

Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under control numbers 0348-0043, 

0348-0044, 0348-0040 and 0348-0046.

    The following requirements have been approved by OMB under control 

number 0648-0384: a Summary Proposal Budget Form (30 minutes per 

response), a Project Summary Form (30 minutes per response), a 

standardized format for the Annual Performance Report (5 hours per 

response), a standardized format for the Final Report (10 hours per 

response) and the submission of up to 20 copies of proposals (10 

minutes per response). The response estimates include the time for 

reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and 

maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the 

collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate 

or any other aspect of this collection of information, including 

suggestions for reducing this burden, to Leslie.McDonald@noaa.gov. 

Copies of these forms and formats can be found on the CSCOR/COP home 

page under Grants Information sections, Parts D and F.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required 

to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty for failure 

to comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act, unless that collection displays a 

currently valid OMB control number



    Dated: May 22, 2002.



Jamison S. Hawkins,

Deputy Assistant Administrator for Ocean Services and Coastal Zone 

Management.

[FR Doc. 02-14069 Filed 6-4-02; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-22-S