Calculus |
|
© Leon van Dommelen |
|
Subsections
1.2 Example
From [1, p. 128, 13a]
Asked: Draw the graph of
1.2.1 Using reasoning
Instead of starting to crunch numbers, look at the pieces first:
Factor
is a parabola with zeros at
:
Squaring gives a quartic with double zeros at
:
Dividing by
will produce a simple pole at
and also a sign
change at negative
:
Function
:
- has an
-extent
and a
-extend
;
- is odd (symmetric with respect to the origin);
- has a relative maximum at -3 of finite curvature:
;
- has a relative minimum at 3 of finite curvature:
;
- has a vertical asymptote at
with asymptotic behavior:
for
;
- behaves asymptotically as
for
;
- is concave up for
, down for
. (Should really prove
this, I guess.)
1.2.2 Using brute force
Hence
- intercepts with
-axis are at
;
- no intercepts with the
axis;
is an odd function of
(symmetric about the origin);
- for
,
(vertical asymptote);
- for
,
(singularity is an odd, simple pole);
- for
,
.
Hence,
for
(
increases from
);
for
(local maximum,
);
for
(
decreases towards
);
for
(singular point, vertical asymptote);
for
(decreases from
);
for
(local minimum,
);
for
(increases to
).
Also,
when
(no horizontal or oblique
asymptotes);
- all derivatives exist, except at
, which has no point on the curve
(no corners, cusps, infinite curvature, or other singular points);
- probably no inflection points.
Hence
- really no inflection points (since there is no point at
);
- cocave downward for
, upward for
.
Hence the
- and
-extends are as before.